This guide is maintained as a current resource for September 2026 and covers only the laws of England and Wales. Information is for general guidance, not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor for advice specific to your situation.
Explanation of negligent misstatement in UK business law, including duty of care, legal test, damages, and its role in commercial disputes involving professional advice, financial loss, and reliance in England and Wales.

Negligent misstatement is a form of civil liability in English law that arises where a person provides inaccurate information or advice carelessly, and another party relies on it to their financial detriment. In a business context, it is particularly relevant to professional advice, financial statements, valuation reports, and pre-contractual representations.
In England and Wales, negligent misstatement claims are commonly used in commercial disputes involving accountants, surveyors, consultants, directors, and other professionals whose statements are relied upon in business decision-making.
Meaning of Negligent Misstatement
A negligent misstatement occurs when:
- A false or inaccurate statement is made
- The statement is made carelessly or without reasonable skill and care
- A duty of care exists between the parties
- The claimant relies on the statement
- Financial loss results from that reliance
Unlike fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misstatement does not require dishonesty. The key issue is whether the defendant failed to take reasonable care in making the statement.
The principle is rooted in the landmark case Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1964), which established liability for careless statements causing economic loss where a duty of care exists.
Legal Test for Negligent Misstatement
To succeed in a claim for negligent misstatement in a business context, the claimant must generally prove:
1. Duty of care
The defendant must owe a duty of care to the claimant in relation to the statement.
This often arises where:
- There is a professional relationship
- Advice is given in a commercial context
- It is reasonably foreseeable that the claimant will rely on the statement
- There is sufficient proximity between the parties
2. Breach of duty
The defendant must have failed to exercise reasonable skill and care in making the statement.
This may include:
- Incorrect financial reporting
- Inaccurate valuation of a business
- Careless forecasting or projections
- Failure to verify key information
3. Reliance
The claimant must show that they relied on the statement when making a business decision.
4. Causation and loss
The reliance must have caused financial loss. The loss must not be too remote and must be reasonably foreseeable.
Duty of Care in Business Contexts
The concept of duty of care is central to negligent misstatement claims.
Courts consider factors such as:
- Whether advice was requested or volunteered
- Whether the defendant knew the statement would be relied upon
- Whether reliance was reasonable in a commercial setting
- Whether disclaimers or contractual terms limited responsibility
In business transactions, duty of care commonly arises in:
- Accountancy and audit work
- Financial advisory services
- Property valuations and surveys
- Corporate due diligence reports
- Investment advice and projections
Common Examples in Business
Negligent misstatement frequently arises in commercial disputes involving:
- Overstated business valuations during a sale
- Incorrect financial forecasts provided to investors
- Inaccurate audit reports relied upon by shareholders
- Misleading due diligence reports in mergers and acquisitions
- Professional advice given without proper verification
- Incorrect tax or regulatory guidance in business structuring
These situations often result in significant financial losses, particularly in high-value transactions.
Negligent Misstatement in Business Sales
In business sales and acquisitions, negligent misstatement often occurs where professional advisers or sellers provide inaccurate information that is relied upon during negotiations.
Typical issues include:
- inflated revenue or profit projections
- failure to disclose liabilities
- incorrect customer retention data
- inaccurate asset valuations
- incomplete risk disclosures
These claims frequently overlap with misrepresentation and breach of warranty claims in share or asset purchase agreements.
Remedies for Negligent Misstatement
1. Damages
The primary remedy is compensation for financial loss suffered as a result of reliance on the negligent statement.
Damages may include:
- Loss arising from entering the transaction
- Overpayment for a business or asset
- Loss of expected profits
- Additional costs incurred due to reliance
The aim is to restore the claimant to the position they would have been in had the statement not been made.
2. Limitations on recovery
Damages may be limited by:
- Remoteness of loss
- Intervening events
- Contractual limitation clauses
- Contributory negligence by the claimant
Courts assess whether the loss was a foreseeable consequence of the negligent statement.
Defences to Negligent Misstatement Claims
Common defences include:
- No duty of care existed between the parties
- The claimant did not reasonably rely on the statement
- The statement was not intended to be relied upon
- Proper disclaimers were included in contractual documents
- The claimant contributed to their own loss through inadequate due diligence
In commercial contexts, disclaimers and limitation clauses are particularly important and may restrict or exclude liability if properly drafted and reasonable.
Time Limits for Negligent Misstatement Claims
The standard limitation period is:
- 6 years from the date the cause of action arose
In some cases involving latent damage or concealed negligence, the limitation period may be extended under the Limitation Act 1980 depending on when the claimant discovered or could reasonably have discovered the issue.
Relationship with Other Legal Claims
Negligent misstatement often overlaps with:
- Negligent misrepresentation under the Misrepresentation Act 1967
- Breach of contract claims
- Professional negligence claims
- Fraudulent misrepresentation (where dishonesty is alleged)
The correct legal classification depends on the facts, contractual framework, and nature of the relationship between the parties.
Negligent Misstatement in Professional Services
A significant proportion of claims arise against professionals, including:
- accountants
- auditors
- financial advisers
- surveyors
- solicitors (in advisory roles)
Courts assess whether the professional acted in accordance with the standards of a reasonably competent practitioner in the same field.
Litigation Process in Negligent Misstatement Cases
Claims are typically brought in the High Court (Business and Property Courts) and involve:
- detailed disclosure of documents
- expert witness evidence (financial or technical)
- analysis of reliance and decision-making
- assessment of financial loss and causation
These cases can be complex and often involve significant evidential disputes.
Key Takeaways
Negligent misstatement occurs where inaccurate information or advice is provided carelessly, and another party suffers financial loss as a result of relying on it. In UK business law, liability arises only where a duty of care exists, and courts apply strict tests based on proximity, foreseeability, and reliance. Claims are common in business transactions, professional services, and corporate finance, and typically result in damages for financial loss.