This guide is maintained as a current resource for July 2026 and covers only the laws of England and Wales. Information is for general guidance, not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor for advice specific to your situation.
Time limit to correct Companies House register inaccuracies explained in detail, including court rectification powers, administrative corrections, fraud exceptions, judicial review deadlines, and the 10-year statutory limitation for register-based claims in England and Wales.

The Companies House register is the official public record of UK companies, including details such as directors, shareholders, registered office addresses, and incorporation data. Inaccuracies can arise due to filing mistakes, fraud, administrative error, or outdated information that has not been updated.
Correcting these inaccuracies is governed by a combination of statutory powers under the Companies Act 2006 and administrative processes operated by Companies House. A key legal issue is whether there is a strict time limit for correcting the register and how delay affects the ability to obtain a remedy.
In practice, the answer depends on the legal route used. Some correction mechanisms have no fixed statutory limitation period, while others are constrained by long-stop limits or general limitation law principles.
Legal Basis for Correcting the Companies House Register
The main legal framework is found in the Companies Act 2006, which provides:
- A statutory power for the court to rectify the register where entries are incorrect or missing
- Powers for Companies House (the registrar) to remove or amend certain information
- Procedural rules for notifying and implementing court-ordered corrections
- Separate limitation rules depending on whether a claim is statutory, equitable, or compensatory in nature
Courts have broad discretion to decide what constitutes an “incorrect” entry and whether rectification is appropriate.
Court-Ordered Rectification of the Register
One of the most significant remedies is an application to the court for rectification of the register of members or other statutory registers.
When it applies
This route is typically used where:
- A person has been wrongly added or omitted as a shareholder
- Share ownership has been incorrectly recorded
- Company records contain factual inaccuracies affecting legal rights
- Entries were made without authority or based on invalid documents
Time limit position
There is no specific statutory limitation period in the Companies Act 2006 for bringing a rectification application itself.
However, important constraints apply in practice:
- Courts may refuse relief where there has been excessive delay
- Delay may prejudice third parties who have relied on the register
- Equitable principles such as laches (delay undermining fairness) may apply
- Evidence may become unavailable over time, weakening the claim
This means rectification is not strictly time-barred, but it becomes harder to obtain as time passes.
Ten-Year Long-Stop for Register Liability
A significant statutory limitation applies where claims involve liability arising from register inaccuracies.
Under the Companies Act 2006:
- Liability arising from making or deleting an entry in the register, or failing to do so,
- Is not enforceable after 10 years from the date of the relevant entry or omission.
Practical effect
This ten-year period operates as a long-stop for certain financial or compensatory claims linked to register errors.
It does not prevent rectification orders, but it can block:
- Claims for compensation arising from historical registration mistakes
- Certain shareholder disputes where liability is asserted long after the event
Administrative Corrections by Companies House
Companies House can correct certain inaccuracies without court involvement.
Common administrative corrections include:
- Typographical or clerical errors
- Incorrect filing of standard forms
- Updating director or registered office details
- Replacing defective filings with corrected versions
Time limits
There is no fixed statutory deadline for administrative correction requests. However:
- Companies House practice focuses on current accuracy rather than historical reconstruction
- Older errors may require court intervention instead of administrative correction
- Availability of supporting documents becomes a practical limiting factor
Administrative correction is therefore flexible but not unlimited in practical terms.
Registrar Powers to Remove or Amend Information
The registrar has statutory powers to remove or amend information where:
- A court declares information invalid or unauthorised
- Material is found to be factually inaccurate or derived from fraud
- The court directs removal or correction of specific entries
Time limit position
These powers are not subject to a formal limitation period. However:
- The registrar usually acts following a court order or clear legal basis
- Historic records may be more difficult to amend due to reliance by third parties
Judicial Review and Strict Time Limits
Where a decision of the registrar or Secretary of State is challenged (for example, refusal to amend the register or regulatory decisions connected to filings), judicial review may be available.
Time limit
- Claims must generally be brought promptly and within 3 months
This is a strict procedural limit. Delay beyond this period is usually fatal unless exceptional circumstances apply.
Fraud and Concealment Cases
Where inaccuracies arise from fraud, identity misuse, or deliberate concealment:
- Time limits may be suspended until discovery of the issue
- The limitation clock may not start until the claimant could reasonably have discovered the problem
This is particularly relevant in cases involving:
- Fraudulent company formations
- False director appointments
- Identity theft used in incorporation filings
Even in these cases, courts still expect prompt action once the issue is discovered.
Practical Effects of Delay
Even where a claim is not strictly time-barred, delay has significant consequences:
- Loss or destruction of incorporation and filing records
- Increased reliance by third parties on the incorrect register entry
- Difficulty reconstructing ownership history
- Greater judicial reluctance to disturb settled corporate arrangements
The Companies House register is treated as a public record designed to support commercial certainty, so courts are cautious about late corrections.
Summary of Key Time Limits
- Court rectification of register: no fixed statutory limit, but delay can prevent success
- Register liability claims: 10-year long-stop limitation period
- Judicial review of registrar decisions: 3 months (strict)
- Administrative corrections: no formal limit, but practically constrained
- Fraud cases: limitation may run from discovery rather than occurrence
Practical Steps When an Inaccuracy is Identified
Where a Companies House inaccuracy is discovered, typical steps include:
- Identifying whether the issue is clerical, substantive, or fraudulent
- Checking whether Companies House can correct it administratively
- Considering court rectification if legal rights are affected
- Assessing whether limitation periods may restrict financial claims
- Gathering documentary evidence before records become harder to obtain
Early action is important because correction becomes more complex over time.
Final Thoughts
There is no single time limit for correcting Companies House register inaccuracies in England and Wales. Instead, the applicable deadline depends on the legal mechanism used. Court rectification applications are not strictly time-barred but are affected by delay and equitable principles. Financial claims linked to register errors are subject to a ten-year long-stop, while judicial review proceedings must be brought within three months. Administrative corrections are flexible but practically limited by evidential availability. Prompt identification and action remain critical to achieving an effective correction.