This guide is maintained as a current resource for July 2026 and covers only the laws of England and Wales. Information is for general guidance, not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor for advice specific to your situation.
Guide to obtaining urgent without notice orders in business disputes in England and Wales, explaining CPR Part 25 procedures, freezing orders, search orders, legal tests, and step-by-step applications for emergency commercial court relief.

Urgent without notice orders are a powerful form of interim relief in English commercial litigation. They allow a court to make a decision without informing the other party in advance, typically where delay would cause serious harm or defeat the purpose of the application.
In business disputes, these orders are used sparingly due to their exceptional nature and the procedural imbalance they create. They are most commonly associated with urgent injunctions, asset preservation orders, and evidence preservation measures.
This article explains how to obtain urgent without notice orders in business disputes, the legal tests applied by the courts, the procedural steps involved, and the risks associated with this type of application.
What Is a Without Notice (Ex Parte) Order?
A without notice order is a court order granted without the respondent being informed or present at the initial hearing.
It is also referred to as an ex parte application. In commercial litigation, it is used where notifying the other party in advance would:
- Defeat the purpose of the order
- Allow evidence or assets to be destroyed or concealed
- Cause irreparable harm to the applicant's position
Typical examples include freezing orders and search orders in business disputes.
The court imposes strict safeguards due to the lack of representation from the opposing party.
Legal Basis for Without Notice Orders
The court's power to grant urgent without notice relief comes from:
- Senior Courts Act 1981, section 37 (general injunctive powers)
- Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Part 25 (interim remedies)
- Practice Direction 25A (urgent applications and without notice hearings)
These provisions allow the court to grant interim relief where it is just and convenient to do so.
When Are Without Notice Orders Used in Business Disputes?
Without notice orders are reserved for exceptional circumstances in commercial litigation, including:
1. Freezing orders (Mareva injunctions)
To prevent dissipation of assets before judgment.
2. Search orders (Anton Piller orders)
To preserve or secure evidence at risk of destruction.
3. Urgent injunctions
To stop ongoing breaches of contract, confidentiality violations, or misuse of intellectual property.
4. Asset preservation in fraud claims
Where there is a risk of concealment or transfer of assets.
Courts require strong evidence that notice would likely undermine the effectiveness of the order.
Legal Test for Without Notice Orders
The court applies a strict multi-stage test:
1. Urgency and necessity
The applicant must show that the matter is sufficiently urgent that notice cannot be given.
2. Serious question to be tried
There must be a credible underlying claim with legal merit.
3. Risk of injustice or prejudice
The court considers whether not giving notice is necessary to prevent:
- Asset dissipation
- Evidence destruction
- Frustration of enforcement
4. Full and frank disclosure
The applicant must disclose all material facts, including those adverse to their case.
Failure to meet this requirement is one of the most common reasons for discharge of the order.
Step-by-Step: How to Apply for a Without Notice Order
Step 1: Identify urgency and legal basis
The application must clearly explain:
- Why immediate court intervention is required
- What harm will occur without the order
- The legal claim underlying the dispute
The urgency must be evidenced, not merely asserted.
Step 2: Prepare supporting evidence
Applications must be supported by detailed evidence, typically in a witness statement or affidavit, covering:
- Background to the dispute
- Evidence of wrongdoing or risk (e.g. fraud indicators, asset transfers)
- Attempts to resolve or obtain compliance
- Reasons why notice would defeat the application
In commercial cases, documentary evidence is often critical.
Step 3: Draft the order sought
A precise draft order must be prepared setting out:
- Scope of relief (e.g. freezing bank accounts, restraining conduct)
- Duration of the order
- Reporting or disclosure obligations
- Return date for an inter partes hearing
- Service requirements after the order is made
Courts scrutinise drafting carefully due to the intrusive nature of relief.
Step 4: File the application (often urgently and out of hours)
Applications are made under:
- Form N244 (application notice)
- CPR Part 25 procedure rules
In urgent cases, applications may be:
- Heard the same day
- Heard out of normal court hours
- Dealt with by specialist judges in the Commercial Court
Step 5: Duty of full and frank disclosure
The applicant must present:
- All relevant facts
- Any weaknesses in the case
- Possible defences available to the respondent
- Any delays or procedural issues
Failure to disclose material facts can result in:
- The order being set aside
- Costs sanctions
- Damage to credibility in subsequent proceedings
Step 6: Without notice hearing
At the hearing:
- Only the applicant is represented
- The judge examines the evidence rigorously
- The court may question necessity and proportionality
- The order may be granted, refused, or narrowed
Courts act cautiously due to the absence of the other party.
Step 7: Service and return hearing
If granted:
- The order must be served promptly on the respondent
- The respondent is given a return date to challenge it
- The court reviews whether the order should continue
This safeguard ensures fairness despite the initial absence of notice.
Key Types of Urgent Without Notice Orders in Commercial Cases
Freezing orders
Prevent defendants from disposing of assets worldwide. Common in fraud and insolvency-related disputes.
Search orders
Allow entry to premises to preserve documents or electronic evidence.
Interim injunctions
Prevent ongoing contractual breaches or unlawful conduct.
Disclosure orders
Require immediate preservation or production of key documents.
Risks and Limitations
1. High evidential threshold
Courts require strong, credible evidence of urgency and risk.
2. Full disclosure obligation
Any omission can lead to discharge of the order.
3. Costs exposure
Applicants may face significant adverse costs if the order is wrongly obtained.
4. Reversal risk at return hearing
Orders are temporary and subject to rapid challenge.
5. Reputational and commercial impact
Without notice orders can escalate disputes and damage business relationships.
Example Scenario
A company discovers evidence that a former director is transferring funds to offshore accounts in breach of fiduciary duties.
The company:
- Gathers banking records and email evidence
- Applies urgently for a freezing order without notice
- Files detailed witness evidence explaining risk of dissipation
- Attends a same-day Commercial Court hearing
The court grants a temporary freezing order, with a return date for the defendant to challenge it.
Principles Courts Follow
Courts emphasise:
- Necessity rather than convenience
- Proportionality of relief
- Fairness despite lack of notice
- Strict compliance with disclosure obligations
- Preservation of assets or evidence where justified
Without notice relief is treated as exceptional rather than routine.
Final Thoughts
Obtaining urgent without notice orders in business disputes is a complex and high-stakes process governed by strict procedural safeguards. The applicant must demonstrate urgency, a strong underlying claim, and a real risk of injustice if notice is given.
While these orders can provide powerful protection in commercial litigation-particularly in fraud, asset dissipation, and urgent contractual breaches-they require careful preparation, precise drafting, and full disclosure to the court.