This guide is maintained as a current resource for September 2026 and covers only the laws of England and Wales. Information is for general guidance, not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor for advice specific to your situation.
Comprehensive guidance on obtaining an interim injunction in a business dispute in England and Wales. Learn the legal tests, procedural steps, evidence needed, urgency, cross‑undertaking in damages and practical tips to secure temporary injunctive relief pending trial.

When a business dispute involves the risk of ongoing harm - such as misuse of confidential information, breach of restrictive covenants or threat of asset dissipation - seeking an interim injunction can be an effective way to protect a company's interests while the underlying legal claim is resolved. An interim injunction is a temporary court order designed to preserve the status quo or prevent irreparable damage pending a final hearing or trial. This article explains the legal principles, procedure, evidential requirements and practical considerations for obtaining an interim injunction in England and Wales.
What is an Interim Injunction?
An interim injunction (also known as an interlocutory injunction) is a court order that temporarily restrains a party from acting in a particular way, or requires them to take specific action, until the court determines the substantive dispute. It is discretionary and is intended to protect rights before a final decision at trial. Injunctions can be:
- Prohibitory – preventing a party from taking certain actions (e.g., using confidential information).
- Mandatory – requiring a party to take specific actions (e.g., returning documents).
The court can grant interim injunctions at any stage after proceedings have begun, and in urgent cases before proceedings are issued. They remain in force until trial or further order.
Legal Basis for Interim Injunctions
Interim injunctions are governed by the Civil Procedure Rules and are an equitable remedy based on longstanding legal principles. Under the Senior Courts Act 1981, the court may grant injunctive relief if it is “just and convenient” to do so. In practice, courts apply established tests when considering an application.
The seminal case American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd sets out the core principles that guide courts' discretion, often referred to as the American Cyanamid principles. These require the applicant to show that:
- There is a serious issue to be tried on the substantive claim.
- Damages would not be an adequate remedy for the applicant if the injunction is refused and the claim succeeds at trial.
- That on the balance of convenience, the injunction should be granted (i.e. whether the potential harm to the applicant if refused outweighs harm to the defendant if granted).
The court will also consider issues such as delay in applying and whether the applicant has acted with “clean hands”.
When Can You Apply for an Interim Injunction?
An application can be made:
- After court proceedings have been commenced, which is the usual route.
- Before proceedings start if the circumstances are urgent or it is necessary in the interests of justice (for example to prevent destruction of evidence or transfer of assets). In this situation the applicant is normally required to issue the claim form “immediately” after the injunction is granted.
Urgency is particularly relevant in commercial disputes where further harm could occur if the defendant is given notice.
Step‑by‑Step Procedure
1. Identify the Right Court
Interim injunction applications may be made in the High Court, including the Business and Property Courts, or sometimes in the County Court, depending on the nature of the dispute and the value involved. For urgent applications, the High Court often hears applications due to resource and emergency availability.
2. Prepare the Application
An application normally requires:
- A Claim Form for the underlying dispute.
- An Application Notice specifying the injunction sought, grounds for it, and the date, time and place of the hearing.
- Evidence in support, typically a witness statement or affidavit detailing the facts of the case and why the injunction is necessary.
- A Draft Order setting out the exact terms of the injunction being sought.
For urgent “without notice” applications, you must explain why the other side should not be given notice (for example, because assets may be dissipated if they receive advance warning).
3. Notice and Urgency
Applications can be made:
- On notice – the defendant is given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to attend and respond.
- Without notice (ex parte) – usually in truly urgent cases, but only granted where substantial reasons justify not informing the other party. In such cases the applicant must disclose all facts, including potentially adverse ones, to the court.
Where notice is given, the Civil Procedure Rules generally expect applications to be filed at least three clear days before the hearing.
4. Cross‑Undertaking in Damages
Before an interim injunction is granted, the court usually requires the claimant to give a cross‑undertaking in damages. This is a promise that if the injunction was wrongly granted and the respondent suffers loss as a result, the claimant will compensate them. Applicants must consider the financial risk associated with this undertaking.
5. Hearing and Court Decision
At the hearing, the judge will consider the written evidence and oral submissions. The court applies the key legal principles and the American Cyanamid test. If the judge is satisfied, they will grant the injunction on terms considered appropriate, often until the next case management hearing or final trial.
Remedies and Enforcement
If granted, an interim injunction is a binding court order, and breaching it can expose the defendant to contempt of court proceedings, which can result in fines, seizure of assets or imprisonment. Courts take enforcement seriously because injunctive orders protect rights pending full trial.
Interim injunctions do not resolve the underlying dispute; they only provide temporary protection until the substantive case can be fully heard.
Practical Considerations
Acting Promptly
Delay can significantly weaken an application for interim relief. If the applicant waits too long after the threatened harm was first known, the court may regard damages as an adequate remedy or conclude that urgency no longer exists.
Drafting Clear Orders
The injunction must be drafted with precision, specifying exactly what conduct is restrained or required, and including timescales for compliance. Ambiguous orders are difficult to enforce.
Evidence Quality
Strong evidence is essential. Witness statements must clearly set out facts that demonstrate a serious issue to be tried, irreparable harm and why damages are inadequate. Documentary evidence such as contracts, correspondence or financial records often supports the application.
Costs
Interim injunction applications can be costly due to the urgent nature of hearings and preparation required. Legal advice from experienced solicitors or barristers is typically necessary to prepare the application and risk assess the cross‑undertaking in damages.
Key Takeaways
An interim injunction is a powerful legal tool to protect business interests in England and Wales while a dispute progresses to trial. To obtain one, a claimant must show that there is a serious issue to be tried, that damages would not provide adequate protection, and that on the balance of convenience an injunction is justified. Applications require detailed supporting evidence, a properly drafted application notice and draft order, and often must include a cross‑undertaking in damages. Acting without undue delay, selecting the correct court and understanding procedural requirements under the Civil Procedure Rules are all essential for success.