This guide is maintained as a current resource for July 2026 and covers only the laws of England and Wales. Information is for general guidance, not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor for advice specific to your situation.
Comprehensive guide to challenging a will in England and Wales. Understand the legal grounds for contesting validity, making Inheritance Act 1975 claims, procedural steps, key time limits, and practical risks. Clear, expert guidance for readers navigating will disputes and contested probate.

Disputes over wills are a significant area of contentious probate in England and Wales. When a person dies leaving a will (the testator), it is expected that their estate - property, money, and other assets - will be distributed according to their wishes. However, there are circumstances where beneficiaries or others with an interest in the estate may wish to challenge the validity of a will or seek greater provision from the estate. This guide explains the legal framework, grounds for challenge, procedural steps, relevant time limits, risks, and practical considerations for anyone contemplating a will dispute.
This article is fully informational and educational. It does not constitute personalised legal advice nor imply that the author is a practising solicitor.
Overview of Will Challenges and Available Legal Paths
There are two broad legal avenues to dispute a will:
- Challenging the validity of the will itself (contesting validity).
- Claiming under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (seeking reasonable financial provision).
Both can be pursued if there are legitimate legal grounds, but the basis, procedure, and outcomes differ.
Grounds for Challenging the Validity of a Will
Under English law, a will must meet certain legal requirements and reflect the genuine and unfettered intention of the testator at the time it was made. Common legal grounds for challenging validity include:
1. Lack of Testamentary Capacity
For a will to be valid, the testator must have had sufficient mental capacity at the time of execution. This means understanding the nature and effect of the document, the extent of their assets, and the potential claims of those who might expect to benefit. If the testator was suffering severe illness, dementia, or lacked comprehension when signing the will, the document may be invalid.
2. Undue Influence or Coercion
A will must be made freely. If someone exerted improper pressure, manipulation, coercion, or influence that overbore the testator's independent will, this can provide grounds for challenge. Courts require convincing evidence that undue influence was a decisive factor in the terms of the will.
3. Improper Execution (Formalities)
The Wills Act 1837 prescribes strict formalities: wills must be in writing, signed by the testator, and witnessed by two independent adults present at the same time. Failure to meet these formal requirements may render a will invalid.
4. Lack of Knowledge and Approval
If the testator did not understand or approve the contents of the document they were signing - for example because they were misled or not present when signing occurred - the will may be open to challenge.
5. Fraud or Forgery
Allegations that the will was forged, that the testator's signature was falsified, or that the document was fraudulently created are serious grounds for contest. Claims of fraud require strong evidence, but can lead to the will being set aside in its entirety.
Claims Under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
Even if a will is legally valid, it may fail to make reasonable financial provision for certain individuals who were dependent on the deceased. In such cases, eligible claimants can bring a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. Eligible parties commonly include:
- A spouse or civil partner (current or in some circumstances former).
- Children (including those treated as children of the family).
- Cohabitees who lived with the deceased for a qualifying period (typically two years or more).
- Other financial dependants.
If successful, a court may order that reasonable financial provision be carved out of the estate for the claimant. This is separate from invalidating a will; rather it adjusts the distribution to address perceived unfairness.
Time Limits for Challenging a Will
Time limits are critical in will disputes, but they vary according to the type of claim:
Inheritance Act Claims
Claims under the 1975 Act usually must be brought within six months from the date of the Grant of Probate (or Grant of Letters of Administration). The court may in exceptional circumstances extend this period, but applicants will need a strong reason for delay.
Contesting Validity
There is no strict statutory time limit for challenges based on lack of capacity, undue influence, lack of execution, fraud, or similar grounds. However, courts expect challenges to be made promptly; unreasonable delay can prejudice a case and may lead to refusal on fairness grounds (for example, through the doctrine of laches). Prompt action is essential, particularly before the estate is distributed.
Rectification Claims
If a will contains clerical errors or does not reflect the testator's intentions, a claim for rectification typically must be brought within six months of the Grant of Probate.
Procedural Steps in Challenging a Will
The process of challenging a will involves several key stages:
1. Seek Legal Advice Early
Engage a solicitor with expertise in probate and contentious wills as soon as possible. Early advice can clarify the strength of your case, relevant evidence, and procedural options.
2. Enter a Caveat
Before the Grant of Probate is issued, a caveat can be entered with the Probate Registry to prevent probate being granted for six months (renewable if needed). This gives time to investigate and prepare a challenge.
3. Gather Evidence
Successful claims depend on solid evidence. This may include:
- Medical records and capacity assessments.
- Witness statements.
- Copies of the will and drafting history from the solicitor or will‑writer.
- Correspondence, financial records, and any relevant contemporaneous documents.
4. Attempt Negotiation or Mediation
Many disputes are resolved without formal court hearings. Mediation and negotiation can produce an agreement between parties, reducing legal costs, delay, and emotional stress.
5. Court Proceedings
If settlement is not achieved, formal court proceedings may be necessary. Claims may be issued in the High Court or County Court depending on value, complexity, and grounds. The court will assess the evidence and decide the validity of the will, rectify errors, or make provision orders under the 1975 Act.
Practical Considerations and Risks
Challenging a will carries practical and legal risks:
- Costs: Litigation can be expensive. Legal costs may exceed the value of the contested estate portion, and unsuccessful claimants may be ordered to pay some of the legal costs of other parties.
- Emotional Impact: Disputes can strain family relationships and lead to lasting conflict.
- Evidence Burden: The burden of proof for invalidity lies with the person challenging the will. Speculation or dissatisfaction alone is not enough.
- No Guarantee of Success: Even strong cases may fail if evidence is insufficient or the testator's intentions are upheld.
Key Takeaways
Challenging a will in England and Wales is a complex area of probate law. Legal challenges fall into two main categories: contesting the validity of the will on established legal grounds (such as lack of capacity, undue influence, improper execution or fraud) and claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 for reasonable financial provision. Time limits vary by claim type, with six months from the Grant of Probate for Inheritance Act claims, and no strict deadline for validity challenges, though prompt action is essential. The process typically involves early legal advice, entering a caveat, detailed evidence gathering, attempts at negotiation or mediation, and, if necessary, court proceedings. Potential claimants should weigh the emotional and financial costs against the benefits when deciding how to proceed.