This guide is maintained as a current resource for September 2026 and covers only the laws of England and Wales. Information is for general guidance, not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor for advice specific to your situation.
Comprehensive guide to the Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal process in England and Wales, explaining time limits, grounds of appeal, procedural steps, sift stage, hearings, and outcomes for challenging Employment Tribunal decisions on points of law.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) is the specialist UK tribunal that hears appeals from decisions made by Employment Tribunals in England, Wales, and Scotland. It does not rehear employment disputes or reconsider evidence. Its role is limited to reviewing whether the original tribunal made a legal error.
An appeal to the EAT is therefore not a “second chance” at the same case. It is a structured legal challenge focused on points of law, procedure, and jurisdiction. Understanding the process, time limits, and grounds of appeal is essential before taking any action.
What the Employment Appeal Tribunal Does
The EAT is a superior court of record that sits above the Employment Tribunal system. Its function is to correct errors of law rather than reassess factual findings.
Typical issues considered by the EAT include:
- Misinterpretation or misapplication of the law
- Procedural unfairness in the Employment Tribunal
- Decisions that are legally perverse or not properly reasoned
- Failure to apply relevant legal tests or case law
The EAT does not:
- Rehear witness evidence
- Re-evaluate facts already decided
- Replace the tribunal's view simply because another outcome is possible
Grounds for Appealing to the EAT
An appeal can only be brought on a point of law. Disagreement with the outcome alone is not sufficient.
Common valid grounds include:
- The Employment Tribunal applied the wrong legal test
- The tribunal failed to consider relevant evidence or legal arguments
- The decision was not supported by adequate reasons
- There was a procedural irregularity affecting fairness
- The decision was irrational in a legal sense
Each ground must be clearly set out in written “grounds of appeal”, explaining precisely where the legal error occurred.
Time Limits for Filing an Appeal
Time limits in EAT proceedings are strict.
An appeal must usually be lodged within 42 days of the relevant date, which is typically:
- The date the Employment Tribunal judgment was sent, or
- The date the written reasons were sent (if applicable under the rules)
Key points:
- The appeal must be received by the EAT by 4:00pm on the 42nd day
- Late submissions are rarely accepted
- The time limit applies even if reconsideration of the tribunal decision is also being requested
Failure to comply with the deadline can result in the appeal being rejected without consideration.
Step-by-Step Appeal Process
1. Obtaining the Tribunal Decision and Reasons
Before appealing, the appellant must obtain:
- The Employment Tribunal judgment
- Written reasons for the decision (if provided or requested)
These documents form the foundation of any appeal.
2. Preparing the Notice of Appeal
The appeal is started by completing a Notice of Appeal.
This document must include:
- Details of the parties
- The decision being appealed
- The legal grounds of appeal
- Supporting documents (judgment and reasons)
The grounds must be structured and legally focused, identifying specific errors rather than general dissatisfaction.
3. Lodging the Appeal
The completed appeal can be submitted:
- Through the E-Filing system
- By email
- By post
The appeal is only treated as filed when it is received by the EAT office, not when it is sent.
4. Preliminary “Sift” Stage
Once received, the appeal undergoes an initial paper review by an EAT judge, known as the sift stage.
At this stage, the judge considers whether the appeal has a reasonable prospect of success.
Possible outcomes:
- Appeal allowed to proceed to a full hearing
- Appeal rejected (dismissed at sift stage)
- Request for further clarification or amendment of grounds
If rejected, the appellant may request an oral reconsideration hearing (often referred to in practice as a Rule 3(10) hearing).
5. Permission to Appeal
Many appeals are effectively filtered through the sift process, meaning only arguable legal cases proceed.
Where permission is refused:
- The appellant may seek reconsideration within strict time limits
- In some cases, further challenge routes may exist to higher courts
6. Full Appeal Hearing
If the appeal proceeds, a full hearing is listed.
Key characteristics:
- Based primarily on documents and written submissions
- No re-hearing of witnesses
- Focus on legal argument rather than factual disputes
The EAT may:
- Allow the appeal and overturn the decision
- Send the case back to the Employment Tribunal for rehearing
- Vary the original decision in limited circumstances
- Dismiss the appeal
Outcomes of an EAT Appeal
If successful, the EAT may:
- Set aside the Employment Tribunal decision
- Remit the case for a new hearing (often before a different tribunal)
- Substitute its own decision where appropriate
If unsuccessful:
- The original Employment Tribunal decision remains in force
- Further appeal may be possible to the Court of Appeal (subject to permission)
Appeals Beyond the EAT
A further appeal is only possible on a point of law and usually requires permission.
- In England and Wales, permission may be sought from the EAT or the Court of Appeal
- Strict deadlines apply (often measured in days rather than weeks)
- Not all rejected appeals can proceed further, depending on procedural rules
Practical Considerations and Risks
Key considerations before appealing include:
- Strict deadlines with limited discretion for extensions
- High legal threshold (point of law required)
- Limited chance of success without identifiable legal error
- Potential for costs orders in certain circumstances
- Complexity of procedural rules and documentation requirements
Many appellants obtain legal advice before proceeding due to the technical nature of EAT appeals.
Common Questions
Can new evidence be introduced?
Generally no. The EAT focuses on whether the Employment Tribunal made a legal error based on the evidence already presented.
Does the EAT re-hear the case?
No. It is not a retrial. It is a legal review of the original decision.
What happens if I miss the deadline?
The appeal may be rejected. Extensions are rarely granted and require strong justification.
Is legal representation required?
It is not mandatory, but appeals involve complex legal drafting and procedure, making representation common.
Key Takeaways
The Employment Appeal Tribunal process is a structured legal mechanism for challenging Employment Tribunal decisions on points of law only. Appeals must be lodged within strict time limits, supported by clearly defined legal grounds, and follow a formal procedural pathway including an initial sift stage and, if permitted, a full hearing. The EAT does not re-examine facts or rehear cases but focuses on correcting legal errors. Understanding the procedural requirements and limitations is essential before commencing an appeal.