Claiming Misrepresentation in Contracts

Editorial Status & Legal Guidance

This guide is maintained as a current resource for September 2026 and covers only the laws of England and Wales. Information is for general guidance, not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor for advice specific to your situation.

Key Takeaways for Claiming Misrepresentation in Contracts

Comprehensive guide to claiming misrepresentation in contracts in England and Wales. Learn what misrepresentation is, how to prove it, the types (fraudulent, negligent, innocent), remedies including rescission and damages, how to make a claim, procedural steps, and common legal questions.

Contractual Fairness: Contracts are subject to the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and Consumer Rights Act 2015. Professional review can prevent unfair terms.

Entering a contract based on incorrect or misleading information can have serious financial and legal consequences. In England and Wales, the law recognises that where one party has induced another into a contract by making a false representation of fact or law, the misled party may have rights to undo the contract and seek compensation. This article explains how to claim misrepresentation, the legal framework, the types of misrepresentation, available remedies, the standard of proof, time limits, practical steps to take, and common issues consumers face when pursuing claims.

What Is Misrepresentation?

A misrepresentation occurs when one party to a contract makes a untrue statement of fact or law that induces the other party into entering that contract. The key elements are:

  • The statement must be about a fact or law - not an opinion or future intention (unless the speaker had no reasonable basis to believe it).
  • It must be made before the contract is formed.
  • The misled party must have relied on that statement when deciding to enter the contract.

This concept is grounded in both common law and the Misrepresentation Act 1967, which together govern how misrepresentation claims are pursued and what remedies are available.

Common Law Basis

At common law, misrepresentation is recognised as a cause of action separate from breach of contract. If a statement made during negotiations is false and material, a mislead party may be entitled to rescind the contract and, in some circumstances, claim damages.

Misrepresentation Act 1967

The Misrepresentation Act 1967 supplements the common law by clarifying certain rights and remedies. It introduced statutory rights to claim damages more easily (especially for negligent misrepresentation) and removed some old obstacles to rescission. Under section 2(1) of the Act, a misrepresentation that would have entitled the claimant to damages if made fraudulently attracts liability even if it was not fraudulent, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds to believe the statement was true. Section 2(2) also permits the court to award damages instead of rescission in certain circumstances.

Related:  Cancelling Online Contracts: A Guide to Consumer Rights

Types of Misrepresentation

The legal remedies available and the evidence required depend on how the false statement was made. UK law recognises three principal types:

1. Fraudulent Misrepresentation

This arises when a false statement is made:

  • Knowingly,
  • Without belief in its truth, or
  • Recklessly, without caring whether it was true.

For example, a seller knowingly exaggerates the performance of a product to secure a contract. In such cases, the misled party can generally claim rescission and damages - including compensation for losses directly caused by the misrepresentation.

2. Negligent Misrepresentation

Under section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, a misrepresentation made carelessly or without reasonable grounds for belief may attract liability similar to fraudulent misrepresentation. In these cases, the burden of proof shifts to the representor to show they acted reasonably in making the statement. Remedies can include both rescission and damages.

3. Innocent Misrepresentation

This occurs where the representor had reasonable grounds to believe the statement was true at the time it was made. Here, the claimant can usually rescind the contract. In some cases, the court may award damages instead of rescission under section 2(2) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, though both remedies are not typically available together.

Remedies for Misrepresentation

The core remedies available when misrepresentation is established are:

1. Rescission (Unwinding the Contract)

Rescission sets the contract aside, aiming to return both parties to the positions they occupied before the contract was made. This means returning any goods, services or money exchanged.

Rescission is available for all types of misrepresentation but may be unavailable if:

  • You have affirmed the contract by continuing with it after discovering the misrepresentation.
  • Too much time has passed, making rescission impractical.
  • It is impossible to restore the parties to their original positions.
  • A third party's rights have intervened.
Related:  Rescission for Misrepresentation

2. Damages (Financial Compensation)

Damages aim to compensate you for losses caused by the misrepresentation. The scope and measure depend on the type:

  • Fraudulent misrepresentation: Damages are generally assessed on the tort of deceit, which can include a wide range of losses directly flowing from the misrepresentation.
  • Negligent misrepresentation: Under section 2(1) of the Act, damages are available unless the representor proves they had reasonable grounds to believe the statement was true.
  • Innocent misrepresentation: The court may award damages in lieu of rescission if it is equitable to do so, under section 2(2).

How to Pursue a Misrepresentation Claim

1. Establish the Misrepresentation

To make a valid claim, you need to show:

  • A false statement of fact or law was made.
  • The statement was made before you entered the contract.
  • You relied on that statement when agreeing to the contract.
  • You suffered loss or detriment as a result.

2. Decide on the Type of Misrepresentation

Identify whether the misrepresentation was fraudulent, negligent, or innocent. This affects the evidence you need and the likely remedies available. Negligent misrepresentation claims under section 2(1) often require less stringent proof than common law negligence claims.

3. Collect Evidence

Gather all relevant documentation, including:

  • Emails, letters, advertisements or marketing materials containing the statements in question.
  • Contracts and signed agreements.
  • Witness statements or expert reports demonstrating the falsity and impact of the representation.

Clear and contemporaneous evidence of reliance is vital.

4. Attempt Resolution Before Litigation

Often misrepresentation disputes are resolved by negotiation, mediation, or formal letters before court proceedings. Setting out the facts and the remedy sought (rescission, damages or both) can prompt early settlement.

5. Court or Tribunal Proceedings

If negotiation fails, you can issue a claim in the civil courts - usually in the county court for consumer matters or in higher courts for more substantial cases. Legal representation is advisable, especially in complex or high‑value disputes.

Time Limits and Practical Considerations

  • There is no specific statutory “deadline” for making a misrepresentation claim, but you must act promptly. The longer you delay, the more likely a court will find you have affirmed the contract or that rescission is unjust.
  • If seeking rescission, you should communicate your intention to rescind as soon as the misrepresentation is discovered.
  • Courts may refuse rescission on equitable grounds if it would cause disproportionate harm or is impractical to enforce.
Related:  Cancelling Service Contracts

Common Questions About Misrepresentation Claims

Is Misrepresentation the Same as Breach of Contract?

No. A breach of contract concerns failure to perform contractual obligations after the contract is formed. Misrepresentation relates to false statements made before formation that induced the contract. Both can overlap, but they are distinct legal concepts with different remedies.

Can I Claim If the Statement Was an Opinion?

Generally, only statements of fact or law give rise to a claim. Statements that are genuinely opinions or future intentions are not misrepresentations unless the representor had no reasonable basis to believe them.

What If the Contract Contains an Exclusion Clause?

Under section 3 of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, terms that exclude or limit liability for misrepresentation are subject to the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and must meet legal reasonableness tests to be effective.

Summary

A misrepresentation claim allows individuals and businesses to challenge a contract formed on the basis of false or misleading statements. UK law recognises fraudulent, negligent and innocent misrepresentation, each with distinct remedies. Successful claims can lead to rescission (undoing the contract) and/or damages to compensate for losses. Building a strong claim requires clear evidence of the false representation, reliance, and resultant loss. Acting promptly and understanding the types of misrepresentation and available remedies are critical to protecting your legal rights in contractual disputes under English and Welsh law.

James William Steven Parker
James William Steven Parker
James is the founder of UKLegalGuides.com and a former agent at the Ministry of Justice (UK). With a background in processing legal claims, he launched this platform to make the laws of England and Wales accessible to everyone.
Scroll to Top